Hi Old New Wayers,
For the meeting on Wednesday night, I would like everybody (who can make it) to bring at least one photo or image with you.
(Yes, it can be on a screen, so long as we can pass it around!)
Bring something that either:
- Strikes you as beautiful or artistic in some way, or
- Represents something important or meaningful to you (that is, even if it is not “beautiful or artistic”).
I would love to talk about the role of photos and images in our lives (including Instagram, Facebook, family photos, etc.).
Do they bring us meaning? How do they interfere with it?
Why are we compelled to represent the rush of our lives in a static form? How does it interact with our natural ways of remembering? What do you like to look at in photographs, and why?
Lots of interesting questions that we all ponder sometimes. It will be useful, I think, to examine them together.
Also, if you scroll down to the bottom of our Reading for Our Eleventh Meeting on March 30, 2016 — PHOTOGRAPHY post, and you will find two videos worth watching. One is a TED talk by JR (suggested by Kristen), the other is a link to John Berger, Ways of Seeing (suggested by Marie-José).
An artist friend, Jessie Thatcher, submitted the following essay by Agnes Martin:
Beauty Is the Mystery of Life by Agnes Martin
When I think of art, I think of beauty. Beauty is the mystery of life. It is not in the eye, it is in my mind. In our minds there is awareness of perfection.
We respond to beauty with emotion. Beauty speaks a message to us. We are confused about this message because of distractions. Sometimes we even think that it is in the mail. The message is about different kinds of happiness and joy. Joy is most successfully represented in Beethoven's Ninth Symphony and by the Parthenon.
All artwork is about beauty; all positive work represents it and celebrates it. All negative art protests the lack of beauty in our lives. When a beautiful rose dies, beauty does not die because it is not really in the rose. Beauty is an awareness in the mind. It is a mental and emotional response that we make. We respond to life as though it were perfect. When we go into a forest we do not see the fallen rotting trees. We are inspired by a multitude of uprising trees. We even hear a silence when it is not really silent. When we see a newborn baby we say it is beautiful – perfect.
The goal of life is happiness and to respond to life as though it were perfect is the way to happiness. It is also the way to positive artwork.
It is not in the role of an artist to worry about life – to feel responsible for creating a better world. This is a very serious distraction. All your conditioning has been directed toward intellectual living. This is useless in artwork. All human knowledge is useless in artwork. Concepts, relationships, categories, classifications, deductions are distractions of mind that we wish to hold free for inspiration.
There are two parts of the mind. The outer mind that records facts and the inner mind that says "yes" and "no." When you think of something that you should do, the inner mind says "yes" and you feel elated. We call this inspiration.
For an artist this is the only way. There is no help anywhere. He must listen to his own mind.
The way of the artist is an entirely different way. It is a way of surrender. He must surrender to his own mind.
When you look in your mind you find it covered with a lot of rubbishy thoughts. You have to penetrate these and hear what your mind is telling you to do. Such work is original work. All other work made from ideas is not inspired and is not artwork.
Artwork is responded to with happy emotions. Work about ideas is responded to with other ideas. There is so much written about art that it is mistaken for an intellectual pursuit.
It is quite commonly thought that the intellect is responsible for everything that is made and done. It is commonly thought that everything that is can be put into words. But there is a wide range of emotional response that we make that cannot be put into words. We are so used to making these emotional responses that we are not consciously aware of them until they are represented in artwork.
Out emotional life is really dominant over our intellectual life, but we do not realize it.
You must discover the artwork that you like, and realize the response that you make to it. You must especially know the response that you make to your own work. It is in this way that you discover your direction and the truth about yourself. If you do not discover your response to your own work, you miss the reward. You must look at the work and know how it makes you feel.
If you are not an artist, you can make discoveries about yourself by knowing your response to work that you like.
Ask yourself, What kind of happiness do I feel with this music or this picture?
There is happiness that we feel without any material stimulation. We may wake up in the morning feeling happy for no reason. Abstract or nonobjective feelings are a very important part of our lives. Personal emotions and sentimentality are anti-art.
We make artwork as something that we have to do, not knowing how it will work out. When it is finished we have to see if it is effective. Even if we obey inspiration we cannot expect all the work to be successful. An artist is a person who can recognize failure.
If you were a composer you would not expect everything you played to be a composition. It iss the same in the graphic arts. There are many failures.
Artwork is the only work in the world that is unmaterialistic. All other work contributes to human welfare and comfort. You can see from this that human welfare and comfort are not the interests of the artist. He is irresponsible because his life goes in a different direction. His mind will be involved with beauty and happiness. It is possible to work at something other than art and maintain this state of mind and be moving ahead as an artist. The unmaterial interest is essential.
The newest trend and the art scene are unnecessary distractions for a serious artist. He will much more rewarded responding to art of all times and places – not as art history but considering each piece and its value to him.
You can't think, My life is more important than the work, and get the work. You have to think the work is paramount in your life. An artist's life is adventurous: one new thing after another.
I have been talking directly to artists, but it applies to all. Take advantage of the awareness of perfection in your mind. See perfection in everything around you. See if you can discover your true feelings when listening to music. Make happiness your goal. The way to discover the truth about this life is to discover yourself. Say to yourself, What do I like and what do I want? Find out exactly what you want in life. Ask your mind for inspiration about everything.
Beauty illustrates happiness: the wind in the grass, the glistening waves following each other, the flight of birds – all speak of happiness.
The clear blue sky illustrates a different kind of happiness, and the soft dark night a different kind. There are an infinite number of different kinds of happiness.
The response is the same for the observer as it is for the artist. The response to art is the real art field.
Composition is an absolute mystery. It is dictated by the mind. The artist searchers for certain sounds or lines that are acceptable to the mind and finally an arrangement of them that is acceptable. The acceptable compositions arouse certain
feelings of appreciation in the observer. Some compositions appeal to some, and some to others.
But if they are not accepted by the artist's mind, they will not appeal to anyone. Composition and acceptance by mind are essential to artwork. Commercial art is consciously made to appeal to the senses, which is different. Artwork is very valuable and it is also very scarce. It takes a great deal of application to make a composition that is totally acceptable. Beethoven's symphonies, with every note composed, represent a titanic human effort.
To progress in life you must give up the things that you do not like. Give up doing the things that you do not like to do. You must find the things that you do like – the things that are acceptable to your mind.
You can see that you will have to have time to yourself to find out what appeals to your mind. While you go along with others, you are not really living your life.
To rebel against others is just as futile. You must find your way.
Happiness is being on the beam with life – to feel the pull of life. *
And finally… for those who don’t have time to get to the readings this week… I wrote up some notes. (I wrote them to try to grope towards some connection between them — still working on that.)
Skim them if you want a (very basic) sense of what was in there.
See you soon!
Some Brief Notes on the Readings
Scruton, BEAUTY: A SHORT INTRODUCTION
He asks, Is beauty an ultimate value? (like Truth, Goodness?)
His answer: it is not the same.
If it were the same, then why would being an “aesthete” be seen as a term of derision?
Why are many people skeptical of over-indulgence in respect to beauty (but not truth or goodness)?
Scruton’s five “platitudes”:
- Beauty pleases us.
- It is comparative.
- It demands attention.
- Judgments of taste are about the object being perceived (not merely about the one doing the perceiving)
- Still, no convincing proof of beauty or taste is available.
Strange paradox: beauty FEELS objective, yet we cannot convince others of it (if they don’t already agree).
Types of Beauty to think about:
- Ecstatic, extreme experiences of it
- Everyday experiences of it
- The ‘Sublime’
- The “Picturesque”
- ‘Form follows function,’ i.e. utility (practical arts)
- Only for pleasure – “the thing itself” (fine arts)
- Sensory element (but not only…)
- Abstract / intellectual element (framing)
- Can be expressed in the form of a ‘style’
Scruton argues that mere taste, smell, touch, are not enough to constitute beauty (e.g. wine).
We need some mental part too.
Beauty is experienced in a “presented form.”
Evolutionary explanations for beauty:
- Group selection (ritual, shared purposes, etc.)
- Individual sexual selection (but is a peacock tail really doing the same work as Bach?)
Certainly beauty is related to desire.
But how so?
It can inspire the desire to possess… a body, an artwork, a piece of jewelry…
But there is also understood to be a Platonic, so-called “higher” form of beauty, which creates a desire not for possession but for contemplation.
Eros is perhaps best described as the act of singling out.
Consider the difference between pornography and (deeper?) beauty of “embodiment.”
Pornography provokes in some the desire to possess. Beauty provokes something quite different… a kind of disinterested state of wonder.
Note that there is a parallel when we turn our gaze to nature.
A sense of the beauty of nature is not the same as a scientific interest in it.
(To know the geology of a cliff is not the same as to marvel at the rocks.)
This feeling of disinterested contemplation became a form of the sacred, as religion receded.
Indeed, art became THE vehicle for beauty in the 19th century, replacing god.
But this has declined in our own era. Beauty is no longer a longed-for experience… Much art is a spectacle, or an attempt to disorient, or a subversive act.
Difference between art that expands our imaginations
pseudo-art, which merely entertains, arouses, amuses, or preaches.
Content vs. form
Scruton discusses Van Gogh’s The Yellow Chair.
Distinction between an artists attempt at representation (observable details, concepts) vs. expression (intuitions).
The yellow chair in the painting may be said to express an unseen life, a relationship with objects; or even something that goes beyond what it represents.
One idea: Beauty may be human experience under the aspect of necessity?
Modernism was an attempt to “recuperate” beauty from its mass reproduction and emptying-out in modern world
But now, according to Scruton, our post-modernist (and increasingly nihilistic) culture is more interested in tearing down.
So the most common forms of art are kitsch and irony.
Kitsch is beauty without consequences – everything works out perfectly, no sacrifice.
Irony is beauty without commitment – nothing is sacred, nothing fixed, just the arrangement and juxtaposition of forms.
Susan Sontag, ON PHOTOGRAPHY
(Sontag’s style is very declarative. So I will simply share some of her declarations:)
To photograph is to appropriate the thing photographed.
Photographs are aggressive. Every use of the camera is an act of interpretation.
Photos take possession of a space in which people feel insecure.
They also refuse experience – by limiting it to a search for the photogenic.
They are fantasy machines. They promote nostalgia.
Always the knowledge gained from photographs is a “kind of sentimentalism, whether cynical or humanist.”
Photographs follow Walt Whitman’s erotic embrace of experience in its entirety. (She mentions William Steiglitz,, Diane Arbus.)
In our era, the image is becoming more important than the original.
We have, she claims, a “steadily more complex sense of the real.”
Morris, BELIEVING IS SEEING
This book is too wonderful to summarize.
It examines, through a series of case histories, the way photographs capture events and things but also contain infinite mysteries. What is authentic? What can we ever really know about the subjects of a photograph? What can a photograph do in the world?